CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8] — Page 129

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

126

"have been of

some

except

a.o

much value.

amount.

showing

air

which tallied with one

"

entry

of the

I disagree with Mr.

Nicolle when he

says

the

was worthless; the

question was,

what

had the official Receiver received?

The

only

voucher that he could

produce, was

the

party

who

one from paid in the

money, and this he has done,

whether this person had been

authorised or

not

to receive.

could not in

any

way affect the amount so

paid in, and

and therefore in

opinion the voucher was

quite, and satisfactory, the oath

or declaration of the collector

could

not

have added to its

authority,

for if the Official Receiver did

not account in

his books for the true amount paid in, he

was in collusion

with the collector who would

not hesitate under these circumstances to make

a false affidavit or declaration.

14.

Whether the collector

had paid in

all that he

received was, I submit,

a question for the Official Receiver and the Creditors, and

if they were satisfied,

I do

not see

any good in further examination or

inquiries by

the auditor.

The law

could do, as I have before remarked, the question for the auditor

was whether

the Official Receiver had re-counted for everything

he had received.

Edit History

2026-05-27 11:24:48 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
126 "have been of some except a.o much value. amount. showing air which tallied with one " entry of the I disagree with Mr. Nicolle when he says the was worthless; the question was, what had the official Receiver received? The only voucher that he could produce, was the party who one from paid in the money, and this he has done, whether this person had been authorised or not to receive. could not in any way affect the amount so paid in, and and therefore in opinion the voucher was quite, and satisfactory, the oath or declaration of the collector could not have added to its authority, for if the Official Receiver did not account in his books for the true amount paid in, he was in collusion with the collector who would not hesitate under these circumstances to make a false affidavit or declaration. 14. Whether the collector had paid in all that he received was, I submit, a question for the Official Receiver and the Creditors, and if they were satisfied, I do not see any good in further examination or inquiries by the auditor. The law could do, as I have before remarked, the question for the auditor was whether the Official Receiver had re-counted for everything he had received.
Baseline (Original)
126 " have been of سویه except a.o nuch value. amount. showing air which tallied with one " entrice ye of the I disagree with Mr. Nicolle when he Celi 1 says the do was worthless; the question was, what Am had the official Receiver received? The coider only voucher that he could the circumstance of the cave produce, was the party who one from paid in the oney, and this he has done, whether this person had been authorised or Me money not to receive. could not in any paid my comm way effect the amount so in, and and therefore in opinion the soucher was picte, and eatisfactory, the oath declaration of the collector *** CA not have added to its authority authority, for if the Official Receiver did. not account in his books for the true amount paid in, he was in collusion with the collector who would not hesitate under these civ. false affi. curustanas to make davit or declaration. 14. Whether the collector had paid in had all that he received was I submit. a question for the Official Receiver and the Creditors, and if after die were satisfied, what inquiry they do not see good any further exans. -queries by ination. aitor the aw could do, as I have be fore remarked the question for the andifor was whether the Official Receiver had re- counted for everything he had received. which ނ
2026-05-27 11:24:48 · Baseline
View content

126

" have been of

سویه

except

a.o

nuch value.

amount.

showing

air

which tallied with one

"

entrice ye

of the

I disagree with Mr.

Nicolle when he

Celi 1

says

the do

was worthless; the

question was,

what

Am

had the official Receiver received?

The

coider

only

voucher that he could

the circumstance of the

cave produce, was

the

party

who

one from paid in the

oney, and this he has done,

whether this person had been

authorised or

Me

money

not

to receive.

could not in

any

paid

my

comm

way effect the amount so

in, and

and therefore in

opinion the soucher was

picte, and eatisfactory, the oath

declaration of the collector

***

CA

not

have added to its

authority

authority, for if the Official Receiver did.

not account in

his books for the true amount paid in, he

was in collusion

with the collector who would

not hesitate under these civ.

false affi.

curustanas to make

davit or declaration.

14.

Whether the collector

had paid in

had

all that he

received was I submit.

a question for the Official Receiver and the Creditors, and

if after die were satisfied,

what

inquiry they

do

not see

good any further exans.

-queries by

ination.

aitor

the aw

could do, as I have be fore remarked the question for the andifor

was whether

the Official Receiver had re- counted for everything

he had received.

which

ނ

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.